Universities challenged on top 1% advert


Image caption

Are universities selectively choosing from ranking results?

Universities in the UK are being challenged over claims to potential students that they are in the “top 1%” of the world’s universities.

Reading University is going to have to take down such a claim after a complaint to the advertising watchdog.

University rankings are increasingly influential for recruitment, particularly for overseas students.

In the new World University Rankings, the top three are US universities – MIT, Stanford and Harvard.

Cambridge is the highest ranked UK university, with three other UK universities in the top 10 of this global league table, published on Thursday.

Advertising to students

But the advertising watchdog has been examining a complaint about how university rankings are being used in marketing.

A description of Reading University as being in the top 1% worldwide had been challenged by a complainant, who said such a figure could not be substantiated and could be misleading.

The Advertising Standards Authority says that this has been “informally resolved”, with the university agreeing that it will remove the claim, without going ahead with a formal investigation or ruling.

Top 10 QS World University Rankings

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
  2. Stanford
  3. Harvard
  4. California Institute of Technology (Caltech)
  5. Cambridge
  6. Oxford
  7. University College London
  8. Imperial College London
  9. Chicago
  10. ETH Zurich

There are many different university rankings, including for individual subjects as well as for institutions, and the results are often used as evidence of international status.

And the challenge over how such rankings are used in marketing will have implications for many other universities.

Charles Heymann, the University of Reading’s head of corporate communications, welcomed the clarification over how universities can present global rankings.

Image copyright
University of Reading

Image caption

The University of Reading appears in the top 200 of global rankings

“It now needs to investigate every single other UK university which claims it is in the top 1% in the world, rather than waiting for individual complaints to be made,” he said of the ASA.

Mr Heymann said that Reading was in the top 200 of the Times Higher Education and QS rankings.

“Like dozens of other UK universities in recent years, we judged this put us in the top 1% out of an estimated 20,000 institutions internationally,” he said.

“We accept, though, the ASA’s view that this could not be proved given no league table assesses every single university worldwide.”

London top city

The latest annual findings of one of the most high profile rankings have been published, listing almost 1,000 universities.

The QS World University Rankings shows the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) once again rated as the world’s best, with the top three unchanged from last year.

The rankings take into account:

  • research publications and citations
  • the views of academics and employers
  • levels of international engagement

Cambridge, Oxford, UCL and Imperial are all in the top 10, but there has been an overall downward trend for UK universities.

There are 76 UK universities in the international rankings, but the compilers say 51 of them are in a lower place than last year.

But London has more universities in the top 50 than any other city in the world.

Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute, blamed a lack of funding for the overall slip in rankings for UK universities.

“The competitiveness of UK universities has been affected by austerity. In particular, tuition fees have been frozen for five years and research funding has not grown as fast as in some other countries,” said Mr Hillman.

Ben Sowter, head of research for the QS rankings, said it also showed that the “rest of the world is becoming increasingly competitive”.

But he said that UK universities were showing the “continued strain on university resources, which appears to be having a deleterious impact on not just research, but also the capacity to deliver world-class teaching”.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *